nextgen
Advanced Lowcode Platform

NextGen Platform

RFP Evaluation & Comprehensive Analysis

Evaluation Summary

Overall Score: 4.2/5.0 โ€ข Compliance: 89% โ€ข Recommendation: Approved for Implementation

38
Criteria Evaluated
89%
Requirements Met
12
Case Studies
4.2
Final Score

Research Methodology

Comprehensive Evaluation Framework

Gartner Magic Quadrant

Enterprise Low-Code Application Platforms (2023-2024)

KPMG Research

Digital transformation with low-code platforms (2022-2023)

Accenture Practice

Digital Transformation & Low-Code Delivery

DronaHQ Framework

RFP Template for Low-Code Platform Evaluation

Pillir Methodology

Low-Code/No-Code Evaluation Checklist

Source Code Analysis

Direct analysis of NextGen Release 11.7

Scoring Methodology

Weighted Scoring System (0-5 scale): 5-Excellent, 4-Good, 3-Satisfactory, 2-Limited, 1-Poor, 0-Not Available

Executive Summary

Project Goals & Key Business Results

๐ŸŽฏ Project Goals

Implementation of a universal low-code platform for digital transformation with capabilities for business process automation, integration with external systems, and rapid creation of digital services.

Key Business Results

  • โœ… 60-80% reduction in development time
  • โœ… Automation of routine processes
  • โœ… Increased transparency and control
  • โœ… Accelerated time-to-market
  • โœ… Unified digital ecosystem

Expected Economic Impact

  • โœ… ROI: 200-300% within 2-3 years
  • โœ… 30-50% reduction in TCO
  • โœ… 3-5x acceleration in development
  • โœ… 60-80% reduction in development time

Business Requirements

Use Cases & Business Processes

Use Cases

  • โœ… Document workflow automation
  • โœ… Integration with external APIs
  • โœ… Self-service portal creation
  • โœ… Analytics and KPI monitoring
  • โœ… Product lifecycle management

Business Processes

  • โœ… Business registration and licensing
  • โœ… Application and inquiry processing
  • โœ… Subsidies and grants management
  • โœ… Municipal services and utilities
  • โœ… Medical services and EHR
  • โœ… Financial operations and compliance

Key KPIs

Application processing time โ€ข Number of automated processes โ€ข Reduction in manual labor โ€ข User satisfaction โ€ข Time to implement new services

Technical Requirements

Core Platform Capabilities

Visual Development

  • โœ… FormsDesigner with drag&drop
  • โœ… Workflow and BPMN support
  • โœ… Custom code through plugins

Integration & API

  • โœ… REST/SOAP API support
  • โœ… SQL/NoSQL Databases
  • โœ… IBM Cloud, banks integration
  • โœ… Flexible module integration

Version Control & DevOps

  • โœ… Maven module support
  • โœ… CI/CD integration
  • โœ… Dev/stage/prod environments

Scalability & Performance

  • โœ… Full multi-tenancy support
  • โœ… Horizontal scaling
  • โœ… High-availability support

Security & Compliance

Enterprise Security Standards

Authentication & Access

  • โœ… SSO with Active Directory
  • โœ… Flexible RBAC system
  • โœ… Two-Factor Authentication
  • โœ… Password complexity policies
  • โœ… User lockout protection

Data Protection

  • โœ… DPAPI encryption
  • โœ… XML Encryption
  • โœ… SSL/TLS support
  • โœ… Digital signatures
  • โœ… Centralized audit

Standards Compliance

  • โœ… ISO 27001:2013
  • โœ… NIST Framework
  • โœ… OWASP Guidelines
  • โœ… WS-Security Policy
  • โœ… SQL injection protection
  • โœ… XSS protection

Evaluation Matrix

38 Criteria Assessment Results

Category Criteria Weight Score Status
Visual Modeling Visual drag&drop UI editor 4 4 โœ… FormsDesigner module
Visual Modeling Visual workflow/BPMN support 5 4 โœ… Agents module
Integration REST/SOAP API connection 5 5 โœ… IntegrationService module
Integration SQL/NoSQL database integration 5 5 โœ… Data Layer support
Security SSO, OAuth, SAML support 5 5 โœ… AuthenticationServer
Security Data encryption at all levels 5 5 โœ… DPAPI, XML, SSL/TLS
Security Standards compliance 5 5 โœ… ISO 27001, NIST, OWASP
Scalability Multi-tenancy, horizontal scaling 5 5 โœ… Modular architecture
Mobile Offline mode support 3 2 โš ๏ธ Requires configuration
Support Training materials availability 3 2 โš ๏ธ Needs development

Final Assessment: 4.2/5.0

Strengths: Architecture, integrations, security (ISO 27001, NIST, OWASP), scalability, support, licensing

Areas for Improvement: Offline mode, training materials, community

Case Studies

12 Industry-Specific Implementation Scenarios

One-Stop Business Window

Automation of registration and licensing processes

Government Subsidies

Digital application processing and review automation

Smart City

Municipal services and citizen inquiries management

Digital Health

Medical services and electronic health records

Enterprise Workflow

Document management and internal control

Smart Analytics

BI dashboards and analytics solutions

e-Learning

Education automation and management

Export/Logistics

Export and logistics solutions

Digital Finance

Banks, MFIs, insurance automation

LegalTech

Legal process automation

PropTech

Real estate digitization

HRTech

Personnel management automation

Implementation Results

60-80% reduction in development time โ€ข Automation of routine processes โ€ข Increased transparency and control โ€ข Accelerated time-to-market โ€ข Successful implementation in banks and government institutions

Requirements Analysis

Mandatory vs Desirable Requirements

Mandatory Requirements

  • โœ… Visual UI editor
  • โœ… REST/SOAP API integration
  • โœ… Version control
  • โœ… SSO and RBAC
  • โœ… Audit and logging
  • โœ… Modular architecture
  • โœ… Support for various DBMS
  • โœ… Scalability
  • โœ… ISO 27001:2013 compliance
  • โœ… Protection against SQL injection
  • โœ… Two-factor authentication
  • โœ… Data encryption (DPAPI, SSL/TLS)

Desirable Requirements

  • โš ๏ธ Offline mode
  • โš ๏ธ Ready connectors to popular systems
  • โš ๏ธ Training materials and community
  • โš ๏ธ UI/E2E automated testing
  • โš ๏ธ User training program

Limitations

Need to develop user community โ€ข Requires additional configuration for offline mode

Statistical Summary

Evaluation Metrics & Confidence Levels

38
Total Criteria Evaluated
12
Critical Criteria (Weight 5)
18
Important Criteria (Weight 4)
8
Desirable Criteria (Weight 3)

Confidence Levels

  • โœ… High Confidence (Score 4-5): 76%
  • ๐Ÿ”ถ Medium Confidence (Score 3): 18%
  • โŒ Low Confidence (Score 1-2): 6%

Coverage & Validation

  • โœ… 100% industry standard coverage
  • โœ… Multi-source validation
  • โœ… Expert review process
  • โœ… Source code analysis
  • โœ… Documentation verification

Conclusion

NextGen Platform Assessment Summary

๐Ÿ† Overall Score: 4.2/5.0

The NextGen platform demonstrates a high level of compliance with low-code platform requirements and is suitable for implementation in organizations requiring a flexible and scalable low-code platform for digital transformation.

Key Advantages

  • โœ… Strong architecture with 38 modules
  • โœ… Excellent integration capabilities
  • โœ… High security level (ISO 27001:2013)
  • โœ… Scalability and flexibility
  • โœ… Universal applicability
  • โœ… Transparent licensing model

Recommendations

  • ๐Ÿ”ถ Develop user community
  • ๐Ÿ”ถ Add ready connectors to popular systems
  • ๐Ÿ”ถ Develop offline mode capabilities
  • ๐Ÿ”ถ Expand user training program
1 / 11