Low-Code vs Traditional Development
Comprehensive comparison of development costs, time-to-market, and long-term value between low-code platforms and traditional development approaches
While traditional development may seem cost-effective for individual roles, the combined team requirements and extended timelines result in significantly higher total project costs
Development Phase | Traditional (Months) | Low-Code (Months) | Time Savings |
---|---|---|---|
Requirements & Planning | 2-4 | 1-2 | 50-75% |
Design & Prototyping | 2-3 | 0.5-1 | 67-75% |
Core Development | 6-12 | 1-3 | 75-83% |
Testing & QA | 2-4 | 0.5-1 | 75-88% |
Deployment | 1-2 | 0.2-0.5 | 75-80% |
Low-code platforms reduce development time by 70-85% across all phases, enabling rapid response to market opportunities and user needs
Low-code platforms shift technical risks to the vendor while providing predictable costs and faster value delivery
Beyond cost savings, low-code platforms enable organizational agility and innovation capabilities that create lasting competitive advantages